NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation VS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Choosing between **RTX 6000 Ada** and **RTX 4090** depends on your specific AI workload requirements. The **RTX 6000 Ada** leads in both memory capacity and raw compute power, making it a stronger choice for high-end LLM training. Currently, you can rent these GPUs starting from **$0.35/h** and **$0.18/h** respectively across 22 providers.
RTX 6000 Ada
RTX 4090
📊 Detailed Specifications Comparison
| Specification | RTX 6000 Ada | RTX 4090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture & Design | |||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace | - |
| Process Node | 4nm | 4nm | - |
| Target Market | professional | consumer | - |
| Form Factor | Dual-slot PCIe | 3-slot PCIe | - |
| Memory & Bandwidth | |||
| VRAM Capacity | 48GB | 24GB | +100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X | - |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s | 1.01 TB/s | -5% |
| Memory Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit | - |
| Compute Infrastructure | |||
| CUDA Cores | 18,176 | 16,384 | +11% |
| Tensor Cores (AI) | 568 | 512 | +11% |
| RT Cores (Ray Tracing) | 142 | 128 | +11% |
| AI & Compute Performance (TFLOPS) | |||
| FP32 (Single Precision) | 91.1 TFLOPS | 82.58 TFLOPS | +10% |
| FP16 (Half Precision) | N/A | 165.15 TFLOPS | |
| Power & Efficiency | |||
| TDP (Thermal Design Power) | 300W | 450W | -33% |
| PCIe Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 | - |
🎯 Use Case Recommendations
LLM & Large Model Training
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Higher VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth are critical for training large language models. The RTX 6000 Ada offers 48GB compared to 24GB.
AI Inference
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
For inference workloads, performance per watt matters most. Consider the balance between FP16/INT8 throughput and power consumption.
Budget-Conscious Choice
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Based on current cloud pricing, the RTX 4090 starts at a lower hourly rate.
Technical Deep Dive: RTX 6000 Ada vs RTX 4090
Both GPUs utilize the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture. The primary difference lies in their memory capacity and compute core counts. The RTX 6000 Ada has a significant **24GB VRAM advantage**, which is crucial for training massive datasets or large language models. From a cost perspective, the **RTX 4090** is currently about **49% cheaper** per hour, offering better value for budget-conscious projects.
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is Best For:
- Professional visualization
- AI development
- Data center scale
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is Best For:
- Image generation
- AI development
- Enterprise production
Frequently Asked Questions
Which GPU is better for AI training: RTX 6000 Ada or RTX 4090?
For AI training, the key factors are VRAM size, memory bandwidth, and tensor core performance. The RTX 6000 Ada offers 48GB of GDDR6 memory with 960 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 4090 provides 24GB of GDDR6X with 1.01 TB/s bandwidth. For larger models, the RTX 6000 Ada's higher VRAM capacity gives it an advantage.
What is the price difference between RTX 6000 Ada and RTX 4090 in the cloud?
Cloud GPU rental prices vary by provider and region. Based on our data, RTX 6000 Ada starts at $0.35/hour while RTX 4090 starts at $0.18/hour. This represents a 94% price difference.
Can I use RTX 4090 instead of RTX 6000 Ada for my workload?
It depends on your specific requirements. If your model fits within 24GB of VRAM and you don't need the additional throughput of the RTX 6000 Ada, the RTX 4090 can be a cost-effective alternative. However, for workloads requiring maximum memory capacity or multi-GPU scaling, the RTX 6000 Ada's architecture may be essential.
Ready to rent a GPU?
Compare live pricing across 50+ cloud providers and find the best deal.